Home About Archives Gallery Contact
Skip Navigation Links.
Skip Navigation Links.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
In Response to Brain Mclaren
Author and Emergent Church pastor Brian Mclaren has been playing the part of useful idiot (‘idiot’ in the sense of ignorant or unlearned, not in the sense of mental defect) perfectly for the ever so gifted “Carrot on the end of a Stick” Palestinian propaganda machine. On his recent “pilgrimage” to Israel/West Bank Mclaren blogged about his experiences on his website www.brianmclaren.net. Throughout his many posts Mclaren decries the occupation of Palestine by Israel. Gone from those same posts are any credible facts about said “occupation” or why exactly Israel has had to build “segregation walls” as he calls them along the West Bank. Perhaps Mclaren doesn’t know much about the situation and therefore makes his statements out of ignorance, however, as he says speaking about himself:

“I’ve been an avid reader on the subject for quite a while, but being here now, I see how many of my most basic assumptions were skewed from a lifetime of half-truths, unfair and imbalanced news, well-planned propaganda, and misinformation.”

Perhaps what he says is true, and based upon some recommended readings on his website i.e. Jimmy Carter, Jim Wallis, Shane Claiborne, Walter Brueggeman, I would say that he would have been reading many “half-truths, unfair and imbalanced news, well-planned propaganda, and misinformation.” Since the authors mentioned above all have faulty fact faculties it is no wonder Mclaren chooses not to discuss facts. Facts are just those annoying little things that get in the way when someone is trying to make a point that they are just so sure of being right they don’t want to bother themselves with anything as bothersome as facts. Would have Mclaren actually used facts to support his position on the situation in Israel I would have some definite points on which to argue against him.

 In one of his posts Mclaren mentions Shane Claiborne, a fellow emergent church Christian and bigger useful idiot, who made a name for himself in part by being a tool for Saddam Hussein. During the invasion of Iraq in 2003 he traveled to Baghdad to lend his support to Saddam (in my book that was, and remains, a crime punishable by jail time but who am I to split legal hairs). He also views the United States as a reincarnated Roman Empire enemy of God type country. Not sure if that tells you much about what type of company Mclaren keeps but if you are anything like me you might be trying to grasp how any self proclaimed “Christian” could side with a genocidal, rapist, evil tyrant like Saddam Hussein.

In the future should Mclaren decide to make his case against Israel with facts I implore him to do so in the public eye so his beliefs can be dissected and inspected for truth. Why if he so chose he could do so on his blog and I would respond in kind on mine, or perhaps on his blog so all could see and judge between the two. Perhaps, and this is a legitimate point of contention, I am a nobody and he wouldn’t feel the need to respond to me. In that case I would be happy to enlist any number of qualified friends of mine, whether American of Israeli, to respond to him.

 Meanwhile some questions for Mclaren to consider:

 -If the Palestinian people are the peace loving people that you describe what would a Palestinian controlled Israel look like?

-Why are you silent about Palestinian terrorism against innocent Israeli civilians?

-If the barriers between the West Bank and Israel were simply taken down would all bombings of Israeli citizens stop, or would the bombings and shellings that necessitated them in the first place continue?

 -Can you substantiate the claims you make about Israeli torture of innocent Palestinians?

 -If Palestinians were absorbed into Israeli society would they coexist peacefully as they have proven not to be able to (see Jerusalem) or would they make good on their promise in the Hamas Charter that “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”

-Would the peace that resulted be appealing to you if it included the demeaning of women as is routine with Arabic culture in the Middle East?

-What do you have to say about the Palestinians training their children to hate Israelis and to honor suicide bombers?

 -Is their Biblical precedent for the current “peaceful” means by which Palestinians are struggling for their independence such as random mortar attacks, rocket attacks, and suicide bomber attacks on innocent civilians within Israel?

Those questions are just for starters. Any chance you will want to respond Brian?
Posted by TF Boggs at 2:49 PM     0 Comments
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Don`t call me "Sir."
I`m making a detour on the way home. I walk out of the grocery store, bag of groceries in hand, and try to put my woolen head condom (AKA "the beret") on my head one-handed. Look left, look right, cross the parking lot on a straight-line path to my car.

You`re a civilian heading in for your groceries/beer and you pass awkwardly around me as I juggle my keys. "Excuse me, sir." Or perhaps, "Good evening, sir." Or worst of all, the dreaded, "Thank you for your service, sir."

Sir?

Because it`s an awkward moment, it`s dark, and I`m due home in a few minutes to watch the Siglet while Mrs. Sig goes to her Mary Kay Kult meeting, I just mumble something appreciative-sounding at this moment, or smile, or say "thank you" and drive on.

But it bugs me. Every time. I know you are trying to be respectful, trying to be polite, trying to Support The Troops, but it`s wrong on two levels, and you need to know why.

First, in my professional capacity, "Sir" is a title reserved for commissioned officers, warrant officers, any male about whose status or identity I am unsure, and civilians. We`ll set aside the cynical response ("`Sir?` I work for a living.") and note that it`s simply inaccurate to use on a staff sergeant or any enlisted soldier, no matter how senior. To anyone who has ever had to report to an arrogant lieutenant straight out of West Point, "Sir" reeks of pretension and unearned honors, whereas any dirty enlisted man can take pride in earing the title of "Sergeant."

(I`m only half-kidding. I know you mean well, but it`s really irritating.)

But it`s still appropriate if you identify that guy in uniform as an officer, right? Um. No, not really. And here`s why.

I apologize for resorting to clichéd tactics, but I`m going to hit up a dictionary for this one. "Sir" is a derivative of the Middle English "Sire," circa 13th century, according to Merriam-Webster. You know. The Dark Ages. Feudalism. Nobles and knights running around the landscape, their squires banging coconuts together. Serfdom. Calling someone "sire" was an acknowledgement of their legal power over you, of your subjugation.

Can you think of something less appropriate for one American citizen to call another?

My professional capacity is service to my country by force of arms. (And coffee. Lots and lots of coffee.) The conditions under which I perform this service is such that I cannot operate as a free individual; I work in a hierarchy to maintain order and discipline so I can more effectively render the enemies of my nation unable to harm it. I joined this hierarchy and found my place within it voluntarily, without any compulsion. I accept it as a temporary, limited, and utterly necessary compromise of the American social contract. Under those conditions, in my professional capacity ("specialist in the application of violence"), there are some people that I call "sir." (With some of them, I even mean something by it.)

But outside of that professional context, I call no one "sir." When the work day ends (sometimes a year after it starts), I am an American citizen. You are an American citizen all of the time. I work for you. You don`t call me "sir." You don`t call anyone "sir."

You can thank me for my service. You can buy me a beer. You can show your appreciation in any of a thousand ways, and while it will probably make me a bit uncomfortable, I will try to accept it in the spirit that it`s offered.

But if you really want to acknowledge who I am and what I do, know that three stripes and a rocker mean you can just say, "Good evening, Sergeant."

Sig

Posted by SigSpace at 9:51 PM     1 Comments
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
ETS
Eight years ago today I officially joined the United States Army. I did so as a 19-year-old sophomore in college. Perhaps a bit naive, as I assume most are at 19, I joined after 9/11 spurred me on to do what I had been thinking about for several years. I suppose I figured I would be deployed since our nation was at war when I went to Basic Training but I don’t think it ever really crossed my mind just what exactly all that entailed. Not even a year into my enlistment though I was deployed to Iraq for Operation Iraqi Freedom 1.

Upon serving from March 2003-March 2004 in Iraq I returned home to resume my collegiate studies only to be deployed exactly a year later on the same date that I learned my fate for my first deployment. The second deployment played out a bit differently than the first did as I had six months to sit around in the states waiting for the plane ride as opposed to the eight hours I had for the first one.

My second yearlong tour wrapped up between November 2005 and November 2006. I once again returned home to resume my studies and graduated with my bachelors seven years later and two quarters early. I only had a year and four months left on my reserve contract and spent the time at my hometown unit. At the end of the first six years of my eight year reserve enlistment I joined the Inactive Ready Reserve (IRR) and proceeded to do nothing army related sans making sure my contact info was up to date so the army could get a hold of me should they want to deploy me again.

Those last two years of my contract spent in the IRR went by event free.
It suddenly dawned on me a week or so ago that my contract with the army was up in just a few days and that I would be out officially. No more wondering if I would be called back up. No more thoughts about what I would have to do if faced with an impending deployment. I’m out and (theoretically) the army and I are done. I won’t be signing another contract, and not because I in any way resent the army. Nothing could be further from the truth. My time in the army gave me so much and I am thankful for that fateful day eight years ago. Actually I praise God that I had an able body that allowed me to serve in the military. I made it out alive, physically and mentally intact. I consider that an accomplishment.

It is, however, quite weird when I think about actually being done. I’m not sure what other vets feel upon discharge from service but I’m guessing it is somewhat the same as what I’m feeling now. I’m happy that I’m done, that I can be a bit more certain about my future but at the same time sad that my adventurous military days are over. No more deployments, training, or cool government issued gear. Of course along with that comes the fact that I won’t have to put up with the giant crap hill that is the military a lot of the time. I often tell people that the 10% of good stuff that I enjoyed in the army far outweighed the 90% of crap that I had to put up with. In hindsight I’m pretty sure I mean it when I say so.

I’m still charting my path for the future and haven’t quite figured out what that looks like yet but I’m sure it will be apart form the military. I know that I want to do what I can to keep America safe and free so there are several avenues I am pursuing. Check back often to see if any of them work. I’ll continue to write on this blog as military matters still interest me and as long as I feel that I have something to contribute I will do so.

My goal now is to get as many fine young kids to join up so they can have the same experiences that I did. If you happen to be one of those fine young able-bodied kids what are you waiting for? Trust me, the 10% of good stuff far outweighs the 90% of crap you have to put up with.
Posted by TF Boggs at 7:13 PM     5 Comments
Archive::.
Skip Navigation Links.